After the first findings
Corrective re-audit
A second pass over the same class of procurement applications once the organisation says the gaps have been closed.
Corrective action is often a circular: training held, template updated, one sample file repaired. A re-audit looks at a fresh sample from the period after the circular. If the same missing declaration reappears, the finding stays open.
We keep the original numbering so management can see movement without rereading the first report from scratch.
Who it is for
Teams that have already had a review from us or from another party and need an independent check that the repair is in the file, not only in a memo.
What you receive
A comparison against the original findings list, with each item marked closed, partly closed, or still open, and a short residual-risk note.
- Status of each prior finding against new applications
- Whether templates in use match the templates described
- Fresh sample from the period after the stated fix
- Any new gap introduced by the repair itself